# Running a workshop > Plan and run a one-day, face-to-face workshop on one area of this site, with three tables for three levels. Page: https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/guides/running-a-workshop/ License: CC BY-SA 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ ## Who this is for This guide is for a trainer who runs one area's course as a face-to-face workshop. The room holds 6 to 20 people with their own laptops, and one trainer works with a few helpers. The site is the reference for everything taught. The worked example is the [Coding with agents](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/) course. The plan works for the other areas too, with the changes for the Foundations areas that the next section names. ## Three tables The room has three tables, one per level. People sit at the table that fits how they learn best on the day, and the placement quiz suggests which one. - **(A) Clear-instruction.** A workshop level with no site setting, for people who can't reasonably learn this material from the site on their own. The trainer gives them the most time: a demonstration first, then the same task done together, then alone. People who finish early repeat the exercise without the worked example. - **(B) Less comfortable.** The site's `less` comfort level. People here can work from the site with hints, so they try the exercise first and discuss it after. People who finish early take the stretch goal. - **(C) More comfortable.** The site's `more` comfort level. People here work ahead and time their own work against a forecast. People who finish early help table B. Learners set their comfort level on the [settings](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/settings/) page, so ask B and C to set theirs at the start of the day. Table C helps table B, and never table A, because table A needs a slower pace and a fixed method. Anyone may move to another table after the first block. The Foundations areas (Concepts, Safety, Using agents) have no comfort levels on the site. In those workshops B and C are workshop levels too, and the finished state of an exercise is a written answer. ## Before the day - Send the placement quiz and the setup instructions a week ahead. - Offer a 30-minute drop-in setup call. By its end, each person has the agent installed and signed in, your fixture repositories cloned, and one command run in it. - Have one helper for every eight participants, and put most of them at table A. - Do every exercise yourself in the current version of the site. - Bring two colors of sticky notes for each person. - Set the date of the follow-up session. For Coding with agents, each lesson has its own fixture. Make your own copy of each fixture you use with the steps in [The fixture](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/first-session/#the-fixture) section of the first lesson. Commit and tag the start state and the finished state of every exercise in each copy. Then push the copies with their tags to a place where the pairs clone them at the setup call. ## The placement quiz The quiz takes ten minutes. Present it as the first exercise of the workshop. You grade no answers, and nobody sees a score. Take every item from the area's own lessons. The example items below come from Coding with agents. - **Self-placement, two items.** Each item gives one sentence per level, and the person picks the one that describes them best. Example: "I want to watch someone do it before I try" (A), "I can follow written steps and ask when I get stuck" (B), "I would rather start on my own and compare after" (C). - **What do you do next, two items.** Each item shows a task and part of an agent's output, with four options. Each option marks a level. Example: the agent says it fixed the off-by-one error in `done()` and shows a diff without test output. The options are "commit it" (A), "ask it to explain the diff" (A), "read the diff" (B), and "run the tests yourself" (C). - **Ordering, one item.** The steps of a change, shuffled, to put back in order. Example: "let the agent make the change", "run the tests to check the change", "ask the agent for a plan and read it". The order is plan, then change, then tests. - **What does this print, one item.** A short piece of real code, as in the site's predict checkpoints. Example: in the first lesson's fixture, start from an empty list in `/tmp/quiz.json`, so nothing writes to the fixture's `todos.json`. After `TODO_FILE=/tmp/quiz.json python3 todo.py add "Buy milk"` and `TODO_FILE=/tmp/quiz.json python3 todo.py add "Call Sam"`, what does `TODO_FILE=/tmp/quiz.json python3 todo.py done 1` print? It prints `done #1: Call Sam`. This item gives away the off-by-one bug that the first lesson teaches. - **Usage, one item.** "The last time you used an assistant, at what point did you first ask it for code?" Offer three answers: "at the start" (A), "after I described the task" (B), and "after I wrote a plan or a check" (C). A wrong ordering or print answer counts as A, and a right one counts as C. To score, count the answers marked A, B, and C for each person. The person starts at the table with the highest count. A tie goes to the table with more support, so A before B and B before C. This quiz is untested, so record each person's answers next to the table where they ended the day. ## The day These timings are a guideline and untested. Correct them after your first workshop and note what changed. | When | What | | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | 0:00 | Shared opening, 30 min: a short non-coding puzzle, why three tables, the placement result, permission to move, a 1-to-5 confidence number | | 0:30 | Block 1, 60 min | | 1:30 | Break, 15 min, minute cards, re-seat | | 1:45 | Block 2, 60 min | | 2:45 | Plenary, 15 min: one question to the whole room, answer alone, discuss in pairs, answer again | | 3:00 | Lunch, 45 min, minute cards, re-seat | | 3:45 | Block 3, 60 min | | 4:45 | Break, 15 min, minute cards | | 5:00 | Block 4, 60 min | | 6:00 | Shared closing, 30 min | A two-day workshop repeats blocks 1 to 4 on day two. Day one then ends with minute cards and a re-seat. The trainer chooses which lessons fill which block for each area. For Coding with agents, blocks 1 and 2 can look like this: | Block | Table A | Table B | Table C | | ----- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | 1 | [Your first session with a coding agent](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/first-session/), with a demonstration | Same as table A | Same as table A, then [Keeping API keys out of the agent's reach](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/keys-and-secrets/) | | 2 | [Keeping API keys out of the agent's reach](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/keys-and-secrets/) | Same as table A, then [Deciding whether to build it at all](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/deciding-what-to-build/) | [Splitting the work into components the agent can build one at a time](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/coding-with-agents/decomposing-the-work/) | **Shared opening.** Everyone sits together for the puzzle and the reasons for three tables. Then each person writes down a confidence number from 1 to 5 and goes to the table the quiz suggested. **A 60-minute block.** Each block has four parts. Connect (5 min) links the block to what people already did. Concepts (0 to 10 min) is longest at table A and can be zero at table C. Practice (35 to 45 min) is the exercise, in pairs. Conclusions (10 min) is a short debrief at each table. **Break.** Collect the minute cards, read them during the break, and use them to suggest table moves before the next block. **Plenary question.** Ask the whole room one question with a few possible answers. People answer alone, discuss in pairs, and answer again, and the change between the two answers tells you what to explain. **Closing.** Pairs present their work, and everyone picks one habit and writes down a second confidence number. The section "Closing and follow-up" below has the details. ## Exercise rules - Give each exercise a start state, a finished state, and a diff between them, as tags such as `ex1-start` and `ex1-done`. Pairs run `git checkout -f ex1-start` to reset and `git checkout -f ex1-done` to see the finished state. Both discard their changes but keep new files, which `git clean -fd` removes. - Leave one thing for the pair to figure out, and build the rest for them in advance. - Always give the agent a check it can run, such as a test, or a command with a known output. - Table A starts from a worked example of the same exercise, with the brief and the check given and only the prompt to write. Tables B and C start from the exercise as the lesson states it, and the stretch goal is for whoever finishes. - Ask each pair for three options before they commit to one. - Write "review every line of the diff" into table A's instructions. ## Room rules - People work in pairs within their own table. They swap roles three or four times an hour, and the less experienced person types. - Check understanding every 10 to 15 minutes with something cheap. Use a sticky note on the laptop, a number from 1 to 5, or a one-line recall question. - Hand out minute cards at every break. Each card has one thing learned and one open question, and you use them to re-seat people. - Never teach alone. A second person keeps the room moving while you help one pair. - Let advanced participants help at table B, and keep them off the microphone. - Start and end breaks on time, and keep a workshop to two days at most. ## Per table **Table A.** Demonstrate the exercise with a deliberate mistake, run it, and let the room see it fail. Then do the exercise together, and then let pairs do it alone. Give each pair the [tutor](https://schubergphilis.github.io/ai-training/guides/tutor/) in a second session, next to the coding agent, for questions about the lesson. It gives hints and keeps the answers back. After a wrong answer it asks a question, and after the next one it points to the section that teaches the idea. **Table B.** People try the exercise first and debrief after. Teach them to write the check before the prompt. Before they let the agent run a command, ask what the worst result of that command could be. **Table C.** People forecast the time an exercise takes and compare it with the actual time. Give them harness work, such as project instructions, hooks, and parallel worktrees. Ask them to decide what they would not hand to the agent, and why. ## Closing and follow-up - Each pair explains one change they made and how they checked it, in two minutes. - Each person picks one habit from a lesson they finished. The site offers habits after a finished lesson and brings them back on a fixed schedule. - Hold a one-hour follow-up two to four weeks later. - Ask for a confidence number from 1 to 5 at the start and at the end of the day, on the same scale. ## What to record - Each person's quiz answers, next to the table where they ended the day. - A feedback form per exercise. It has one line per exercise (too easy, right, or too hard) and one comment. - The minute cards. - Table C's time forecasts next to the actual times. - Both confidence numbers for each person. The timings above and the quiz scoring get corrected from these records, so keep them for every workshop. ## Further reading - [Teaching Tech Together](https://teachtogether.tech/en/): Greg Wilson's book on the approach this guide follows, in particular the chapters [In the Classroom](https://teachtogether.tech/en/index.html#s:classroom) and [Teaching Online](https://teachtogether.tech/en/index.html#s:online) and the section [Plan for Mixed Abilities](https://teachtogether.tech/en/index.html#s:classroom-mixed). - [The Carpentries instructor training](https://carpentries.github.io/instructor-training/): the course material behind sticky notes, minute cards and working with helpers. - [CS50 Educator Workshop](https://cs50.harvard.edu/workshop/): links to the yearly workshop recordings on YouTube, on teaching less comfortable students and on teaching with AI. - [Best practices for Claude Code](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/best-practices): Anthropic's list of five common failure patterns, which works as a checklist in debriefs. - [How I Teach](https://kentcdodds.com/blog/how-i-teach): Kent C. Dodds on doing the exercise before the explanation, and on a feedback form after each exercise.